Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Wimmer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Andreas Wimmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent reliable sources. ~~ Sintaku Talk 00:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 25. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 01:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
? There is a well cited Andreas Wimmer here [1]. Can the nominator say if it is the same person? Xxanthippe (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC).
- Looking at things, I would highly doubt they're the same person. The one you found got a PhD in Zurich in 1992, which wouldn't fit with what this Zimmer's article claims. None of the works listed in this article appear in that GScholar search (as far as I can tell) - they seem to have similar subject areas, but that's where the similarity ends. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Adequate sources not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC).
- Delete. The other Andreas Wimmer found by Xxanthippe looks quite notable, but I don't see the evidence for a pass of WP:PROF (or other notability criteria) for this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not seeing the evidence of notability on this Mr. Wimmer. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.