Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiko Seiko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Blueboy96 23:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keiko Seiko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP: ENT in that she has only had one semi-major role, not the 2+ required. No evidence of "cult following" or "innovative contributions" ThaddeusB (talk) 23:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no real sources for anything. Just the one role, and not much to even say about that one. Possibly will qualify for an article in the future at some point. DreamGuy (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A small part in one film four years ago does not add up to notability. Fences and windows (talk) 01:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 10:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gotta go to work. When I return in some 12 hours, I'll do some genre-specific digging to find out if this actress can pass muster... Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to locate significant coverage by anyone. IMDB page does not support notability. To say coverage is sparse would be an understatement. Not notable. Dlohcierekim 21:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. Unable to find anything special about this actress past the usual WP:V. Certainly The film Hostel (film) received some decent coverage becasue of its producer, its theme, and its locations, and its controversy... but Keiko is overshadowed by everyone else's notability. Pewrhaps her career will blossom... but as of now, its still a bud. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.